<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do you use spatial organization?</title>
	<link>http://dubroy.com/blog/2007/07/31/do-you-use-spatial-organization/</link>
	<description>on programming, usability, and design; by Patrick Dubroy</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://dubroy.com/blog/2007/07/31/do-you-use-spatial-organization/#comment-1828</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dubroy.com/blog/2007/07/31/do-you-use-spatial-organization/#comment-1828</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I do.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was chatting with some people at work about this the other day.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anything I download drops onto my desktop.  A lot of 'short term' projects stay on my desktop.  Longer term things get properly 'filed' and such somewhere else.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Currently, things are a bit sparse.  But, I have a few spreadsheets and some graphics I was working with.  Also a local copy of a web application that I'm working on.  Most of my applications are in Vista 'sidebar' thingy.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don't really like tree structures as a way to organize my e-life.  So, until a point that I have to do it, I tend to keep things as flat as I can, and close at hand.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On my iBook, I don't even pay attention to where I drop things, as I tend to pull them up with desktop search.  On the other hand, OSX makes accessing the desktop very nice (F11 I think?) ... which makes it even more appealing to stack it full of crap.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm not really sold on the idea of using the 'desktop' like a real desk, but, it seems like I'm using it that way.  Thus far, it's just the easiest way I've found to keep my current work close at hand.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Chris.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do.</p>
<p>I was chatting with some people at work about this the other day.</p>
<p>Anything I download drops onto my desktop.  A lot of &#8217;short term&#8217; projects stay on my desktop.  Longer term things get properly &#8216;filed&#8217; and such somewhere else.  </p>
<p>Currently, things are a bit sparse.  But, I have a few spreadsheets and some graphics I was working with.  Also a local copy of a web application that I&#8217;m working on.  Most of my applications are in Vista &#8217;sidebar&#8217; thingy.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really like tree structures as a way to organize my e-life.  So, until a point that I have to do it, I tend to keep things as flat as I can, and close at hand.  </p>
<p>On my iBook, I don&#8217;t even pay attention to where I drop things, as I tend to pull them up with desktop search.  On the other hand, OSX makes accessing the desktop very nice (F11 I think?) &#8230; which makes it even more appealing to stack it full of crap.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really sold on the idea of using the &#8216;desktop&#8217; like a real desk, but, it seems like I&#8217;m using it that way.  Thus far, it&#8217;s just the easiest way I&#8217;ve found to keep my current work close at hand.</p>
<p>Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: e</title>
		<link>http://dubroy.com/blog/2007/07/31/do-you-use-spatial-organization/#comment-1827</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dubroy.com/blog/2007/07/31/do-you-use-spatial-organization/#comment-1827</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I don't, mostly because I try to avoid using a mouse (I have RSI). Even if I didn't, the workflow of spatial organization seems to be onerous: &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Find a way to access the space that contains the items I care about (eg: minimize windows to access the desktop, open a filebrowser that respects the physical organization I've imposed on my stuff)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Navigate around the space, possibly manipulating scroll bars, or window dimensions&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Activate the thing I care about&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If the space is hierarchical, goto 1.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I usually know part of the name of the thing I'm looking for, and its general location. On Windows, this means that I hit the appropriate directory, then start typing to find the item. On Linux, this means I either use a find or grep my history. In Eclipse, I use a wildcard or two to open up the search space.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t, mostly because I try to avoid using a mouse (I have RSI). Even if I didn&#8217;t, the workflow of spatial organization seems to be onerous: </p>
<ol>
<li>Find a way to access the space that contains the items I care about (eg: minimize windows to access the desktop, open a filebrowser that respects the physical organization I&#8217;ve imposed on my stuff)</li>
<li>Navigate around the space, possibly manipulating scroll bars, or window dimensions</li>
<li>Activate the thing I care about</li>
<li>If the space is hierarchical, goto 1.</li>
</ol>
<p>I usually know part of the name of the thing I&#8217;m looking for, and its general location. On Windows, this means that I hit the appropriate directory, then start typing to find the item. On Linux, this means I either use a find or grep my history. In Eclipse, I use a wildcard or two to open up the search space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
